E2-9000 Benchmarks & Performance Report

Sysbuilds Alpha Stage!

Please take all results with a big grain of salt. Sysbuilds is in alpha stage at the moment which can lead to wrong data, strange counting errors, silly results and more. This site is under active development.

Benchmark Results

Combined benchmark scores based on multiple data points, giving a quick overview of this processor's performance.

Overall Score

Overall score for E2-9000 based on all benchmark results gathered. Look at this like a meta score, you will find more specific workload ratings below.

4,087 Rank: 1811

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1807	Pentium 967	4,090	+0.1%
1808	Athlon 64 X2 5400+	4,089	+0%
1809	Core 2 Duo P7570	4,088	+0%
1810	Celeron 3855U	4,087	+0%
1811	E2-9000	4,087
1812	Celeron 3205U	4,086	+-0%
1813	Core 2 Duo E6550	4,084	-0.1%
1814	Xeon E5504	4,083	-0.1%
1815	Core i5-4200Y	4,082	-0.1%
1816	Athlon 64 X2 6000+	4,082	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Multicore Score

Multicore performance score for E2-9000 based on multi-threaded benchmark results.

4,311 Rank: 1727

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1723	Pentium G640	4,311	+0%
1724	Celeron G540	4,311	+0%
1725	Celeron 1005M	4,311	+0%
1726	A6-9210	4,311	+0%
1727	E2-9000	4,311
1728	Core i3-350M	4,311	+0%
1729	A6-5400B	4,310	+-0%
1730	Pentium 4410Y	4,309	+-0%
1731	Celeron G1610T	4,309	+-0%
1732	A4-5300B	4,308	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Singlecore Score

Single-core performance score for E2-9000 based on single-threaded benchmark results.

3,938 Rank: 1814

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1810	Athlon II X3 400e	3,940	+0.1%
1811	Core 2 Duo T5870	3,939	+0%
1812	Athlon II X2 235e	3,939	+0%
1813	Athlon II P340	3,938	+0%
1814	E2-9000	3,938
1815	Celeron E1400	3,936	-0.1%
1816	A8-7100	3,935	-0.1%
1817	Pentium P6000	3,935	-0.1%
1818	Athlon 64 X2 5200+	3,935	-0.1%
1819	Turion II Mobile M500	3,929	-0.2%

View full ranking →

Workload Scores

Performance scores grouped by workload type, normalized and aggregated from multiple raw benchmark results.

Number Crunching

Aggregated score for E2-9000 based on integer math, floating point math, and prime number computation benchmarks.

4,482 Rank: 1659

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1655	Athlon II X2 240	4,482	+0%
1656	Athlon II X2 220	4,482	+0%
1657	A4-3400	4,482	+0%
1658	Celeron E3400	4,482	+0%
1659	E2-9000	4,482
1660	A6-4455M	4,482	+0%
1661	Xeon 5150	4,482	+0%
1662	A4-3420	4,482	+0%
1663	Athlon II X2 235e	4,482	+0%
1664	Pentium 987	4,481	+-0%

View full ranking →

Data Processing

Aggregated score for E2-9000 based on data encryption, data compression, and string sorting benchmarks.

4,443 Rank: 1687

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1683	Celeron N2840	4,444	+0%
1684	Pentium P6000	4,444	+0%
1685	Celeron B815	4,443	+0%
1686	Celeron 887	4,443	+0%
1687	E2-9000	4,443
1688	A6-7000	4,443	+0%
1689	Celeron N3060	4,443	+0%
1690	Celeron 2957U	4,442	+-0%
1691	Celeron 1007U	4,442	+-0%
1692	Celeron N2830	4,441	+-0%

View full ranking →

Physics & Compute

Aggregated score for E2-9000 based on physics simulation and extended instruction set (SSE/AVX) benchmarks.

4,460 Rank: 1665

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1661	Pentium E6800	4,461	+0%
1662	Celeron N3350	4,460	+0%
1663	Celeron 867	4,460	+0%
1664	Pentium E6300	4,460	+0%
1665	E2-9000	4,460
1666	A6-7000	4,460	+0%
1667	Atom x5-Z8300	4,460	+0%
1668	A4-3310MX	4,460	+0%
1669	Celeron 847E	4,459	+-0%
1670	Atom C3338	4,459	+-0%

View full ranking →

E2-9000 Details

As of March 2026, the AMD E2-9000 represents a legacy processor from a bygone era of mobile computing, designed for entry-level systems that prioritized power efficiency over raw performance. Built on a 45 nm process and launched during a time when integrated graphics were still a secondary consideration, the E2-9000 is now among the lowest-ranked processors in modern benchmark evaluations. Its dual-core architecture, with support for four threads via Hyper-Threading, is paired with a modest base clock of 2.2 GHz and a turbo boost up to 2.3 GHz, enabling limited responsiveness in everyday tasks. The processor operates on a 35 W TDP and uses the PGA478 socket, making it compatible with older motherboards and platforms that support Intel’s Core 2 Duo and early Core i-series processors.

Despite its age, the E2-9000 maintains a presence in low-cost or legacy systems where basic computing needs are sufficient. It supports DDR3 memory up to 1333 MHz and can handle up to 16 GB of RAM, although it is limited to two memory channels and a maximum bandwidth of 17.1 GB/s. The integrated Intel HD Graphics 3000 GPU, running at 350 MHz base frequency and capable of bursting to 1 GHz, is capable of light multimedia playback and basic 2D applications, but lacks support for modern graphics APIs or gaming workloads. The GPU supports up to two displays, which is adequate for simple dual-monitor setups in office environments.

In benchmark testing, the E2-9000 scores 4087 overall, placing it #1810 out of 2060 processors, with a single-core score of 3938 (#1813) and a multicore score of 4311 (#1723). These results indicate that while the processor holds its own against some early-generation dual-core Intel Celerons and Pentiums, it falls far behind modern mid-range and high-end CPUs. For instance, it trails behind the Core i3-2357M, a processor from the same era but with superior architecture and better memory controller integration. Its performance is comparable to older Athlon and Core 2 Duo models, but it is outpaced by nearly every modern CPU in the top 50 lists, where scores exceed 7000 and often reach over 9000.

The E2-9000 supports a range of Intel-specific features such as AES-NI, AVX2, HT, EIST, and virtualization technologies like VT-x and VT-d, which provide some utility in light virtualization and encryption tasks. However, the lack of ECC memory support limits its appeal in server or workstation environments. Its inclusion in the Passmark benchmarks shows that it performs slightly better in data processing and physics compute than in single-threaded tasks, suggesting that its multicore performance is marginally stronger than its single-core capabilities—though still modest by today’s standards.

In conclusion, the AMD E2-9000 is best suited for legacy systems, basic office computing, or educational environments where cost and power efficiency outweigh performance demands. It is not competitive with modern processors in any meaningful way, and its age—over a decade since release—makes it obsolete for mainstream use. For users requiring more than basic productivity, an upgrade to a modern CPU is strongly recommended.