Pentium 2127U Benchmarks & Performance Report

Sysbuilds Alpha Stage!

Please take all results with a big grain of salt. Sysbuilds is in alpha stage at the moment which can lead to wrong data, strange counting errors, silly results and more. This site is under active development.

Benchmark Results

Combined benchmark scores based on multiple data points, giving a quick overview of this processor's performance.

Overall Score

Overall score for Pentium 2127U based on all benchmark results gathered. Look at this like a meta score, you will find more specific workload ratings below.

4,207 Rank: 1668

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1664	Phenom II X2 B55	4,211	+0.1%
1665	Xeon E5345	4,210	+0.1%
1666	Xeon D-1518	4,209	+0%
1667	Xeon E5606	4,208	+0%
1668	Pentium 2127U	4,207
1669	Athlon 7750	4,206	+-0%
1670	Celeron B840	4,205	+-0%
1671	Xeon E5506	4,204	-0.1%
1672	Athlon II X3 425	4,204	-0.1%
1673	A6-3650	4,203	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Multicore Score

Multicore performance score for Pentium 2127U based on multi-threaded benchmark results.

4,318 Rank: 1698

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1694	A6-5357M	4,319	+0%
1695	Core i5-2450M	4,318	+0%
1696	Core i3 550	4,318	+0%
1697	A9-9430	4,318	+0%
1698	Pentium 2127U	4,318
1699	Pentium N3540	4,318	+0%
1700	Celeron 2980U	4,318	+0%
1701	Core i3-370M	4,318	+0%
1702	Xeon 5160	4,318	+0%
1703	Celeron 4205U	4,318	+0%

View full ranking →

Singlecore Score

Single-core performance score for Pentium 2127U based on single-threaded benchmark results.

4,133 Rank: 1645

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1641	Celeron E3500	4,142	+0.2%
1642	A8-3820	4,142	+0.2%
1643	Intel Core i3-390M	4,137	+0.1%
1644	FX-9800P	4,137	+0.1%
1645	Pentium 2127U	4,133
1646	Core i3-2350M	4,132	+-0%
1647	Athlon II X4 620	4,131	+-0%
1648	A4-4000	4,131	+-0%
1649	Core 2 Duo P8600	4,131	+-0%
1650	A6-9200	4,130	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Workload Scores

Performance scores grouped by workload type, normalized and aggregated from multiple raw benchmark results.

Number Crunching

Aggregated score for Pentium 2127U based on integer math, floating point math, and prime number computation benchmarks.

4,496 Rank: 1563

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1559	Celeron 3855U	4,496	+0%
1560	Celeron G530	4,496	+0%
1561	Pentium E6700	4,496	+0%
1562	Pentium E6600	4,496	+0%
1563	Pentium 2127U	4,496
1564	A6-9220	4,496	+0%
1565	Celeron 1000M	4,496	+0%
1566	Celeron 1037U	4,496	+0%
1567	Pentium N3540	4,496	+0%
1568	Celeron G1820TE	4,496	+0%

View full ranking →

Data Processing

Aggregated score for Pentium 2127U based on data encryption, data compression, and string sorting benchmarks.

4,452 Rank: 1647

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1643	Core i3-2377M	4,452	+0%
1644	Celeron 3965Y	4,452	+0%
1645	Celeron B840	4,452	+0%
1646	A6-9210	4,452	+0%
1647	Pentium 2127U	4,452
1648	Pentium T4500	4,452	+0%
1649	Celeron 2980U	4,452	+0%
1650	A6-1450	4,452	+0%
1651	Core i3-2367M	4,451	+-0%
1652	Celeron 1000M	4,451	+-0%

View full ranking →

Physics & Compute

Aggregated score for Pentium 2127U based on physics simulation and extended instruction set (SSE/AVX) benchmarks.

4,480 Rank: 1538

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1534	A6-3400M	4,481	+0%
1535	Core i3-350M	4,481	+0%
1536	Celeron B840	4,480	+0%
1537	Athlon II X3 425	4,480	+0%
1538	Pentium 2127U	4,480
1539	A8-3550MX	4,480	+0%
1540	Celeron 3855U	4,479	+-0%
1541	Core i3-2365M	4,479	+-0%
1542	A6-6400K	4,479	+-0%
1543	A4-6320	4,479	+-0%

View full ranking →

Pentium 2127U Details

The Pentium 2127U stands as a modest performer in the broader CPU landscape, positioned well below the elite tier of modern processors. As of March 2026, it remains a relic from an earlier era of mobile computing, with its 22 nm process and FCBGA1023 socket reflecting older design philosophies. Despite its dated architecture, the processor offers a balanced combination of low power consumption and basic multitasking capability, making it suitable for entry-level laptops and lightweight computing tasks. Its overall score of 4207 places it at #1668 out of 2060 CPUs in the Passmark rankings, indicating it performs just above many older dual-core processors but falls far behind current mainstream and high-end offerings.

At the heart of the Pentium 2127U are two cores with two threads, clocked at a base frequency of 1.9 GHz and capable of boosting to 2.0 GHz. It operates on Intel's 22 nm process, a node that was considered advanced a decade ago but now represents a significant efficiency gap compared to modern 5 nm or 7 nm designs. The CPU supports DDR3/L/-RS memory up to 1600 MHz, with a maximum capacity of 32 GB and dual-channel bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s. With a TDP of 17 W, the processor is designed for low-power mobile devices, ensuring acceptable battery life in laptops and ultrabooks where power efficiency is prioritized over raw performance.

Integrated into the processor is Intel's HD Graphics, which operates at a base frequency of 350 MHz and can burst up to 1.1 GHz. The GPU supports up to three displays and is sufficient for basic multimedia playback and light graphical workloads, though it is not suited for gaming or intensive graphics processing. The Pentium 2127U also includes a comprehensive suite of Intel technologies such as AES-NI for encryption, AVX2 for vectorized operations, and Intel vPro for enterprise-level security and manageability. Hyper-Threading, EIST, and VT-x are also present, allowing for basic virtualization and power-saving features.

In benchmark testing, the Pentium 2127U achieves a single-core score of 4133 and a multicore score of 4318, with an overall score of 4207. These results place it in a competitive bracket with older mobile CPUs like the Celeron N2920 and A6-5357M, which score similarly. However, it trails behind newer low-power processors such as the Celeron 1005M and Pentium 3556U, which offer slightly better performance. The multicore performance is particularly weak relative to single-core, suggesting that the processor struggles with workloads that can leverage parallel processing effectively.

In conclusion, the Pentium 2127U is best suited for users requiring a reliable, low-power CPU for everyday tasks such as web browsing, document editing, and media consumption. While it lacks the power and efficiency of modern processors, its longevity and compatibility with older systems make it a viable option in budget devices. For users seeking modern performance, the processor is no longer competitive in today's market, where even entry-level CPUs far surpass its capabilities.