A6-9200 Benchmarks & Performance Report

Sysbuilds Alpha Stage!

Please take all results with a big grain of salt. Sysbuilds is in alpha stage at the moment which can lead to wrong data, strange counting errors, silly results and more. This site is under active development.

Benchmark Results

Combined benchmark scores based on multiple data points, giving a quick overview of this processor's performance.

Overall Score

Overall score for A6-9200 based on all benchmark results gathered. Look at this like a meta score, you will find more specific workload ratings below.

4,218 Rank: 1647

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1643	Phenom II X4 820	4,220	+0%
1644	Phenom II X4 920	4,218	+0%
1645	Core 2 Duo E7300	4,218	+0%
1646	Core 2 Duo P9600	4,218	+0%
1647	A6-9200	4,218
1648	Core i5-450M	4,218	+0%
1649	Intel Pentium P6300	4,217	+-0%
1650	Intel Core i5-450M	4,216	+-0%
1651	Pentium B940	4,215	-0.1%
1652	Intel Core i5-480M	4,215	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Multicore Score

Multicore performance score for A6-9200 based on multi-threaded benchmark results.

4,349 Rank: 1588

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1584	Core 2 Duo E8600	4,350	+0%
1585	Pentium 4405Y	4,349	+0%
1586	Athlon II X4 630	4,349	+0%
1587	A8-5545M	4,349	+0%
1588	A6-9200	4,349
1589	Phenom X4 9600B	4,349	+0%
1590	Atom x7-E3950	4,349	+0%
1591	Intel Core i3-350M	4,348	+-0%
1592	A8-3520M	4,348	+-0%
1593	Core i5-2430M	4,347	+-0%

View full ranking →

Singlecore Score

Single-core performance score for A6-9200 based on single-threaded benchmark results.

4,130 Rank: 1650

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1646	Core i3-2350M	4,132	+0%
1647	Athlon II X4 620	4,131	+0%
1648	A4-4000	4,131	+0%
1649	Core 2 Duo P8600	4,131	+0%
1650	A6-9200	4,130
1651	Xeon X3220	4,129	+-0%
1652	Phenom II X3 710	4,128	+-0%
1653	Xeon E5-2650L v2	4,127	-0.1%
1654	Phenom II N830	4,126	-0.1%
1655	Celeron J4105	4,125	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Workload Scores

Performance scores grouped by workload type, normalized and aggregated from multiple raw benchmark results.

Number Crunching

Aggregated score for A6-9200 based on integer math, floating point math, and prime number computation benchmarks.

4,492 Rank: 1598

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1594	Phenom II X2 B53	4,493	+0%
1595	Celeron J4025	4,493	+0%
1596	Pentium B960	4,492	+0%
1597	A6-9210	4,492	+0%
1598	A6-9200	4,492
1599	Celeron 3205U	4,492	+0%
1600	Atom x7-Z8700	4,491	+-0%
1601	Athlon II X2 270	4,491	+-0%
1602	Pentium E5700	4,491	+-0%
1603	A4-9120	4,491	+-0%

View full ranking →

Data Processing

Aggregated score for A6-9200 based on data encryption, data compression, and string sorting benchmarks.

4,450 Rank: 1656

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1652	Celeron 1000M	4,451	+0%
1653	Pentium 3556U	4,451	+0%
1654	Pentium B940	4,450	+0%
1655	Celeron 1037U	4,450	+0%
1656	A6-9200	4,450
1657	Pentium T4400	4,450	+0%
1658	Core i3-2365M	4,449	+-0%
1659	Pentium P6200	4,449	+-0%
1660	Pentium 2117U	4,449	+-0%
1661	Pentium T4300	4,449	+-0%

View full ranking →

Physics & Compute

Aggregated score for A6-9200 based on physics simulation and extended instruction set (SSE/AVX) benchmarks.

4,464 Rank: 1645

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1641	Celeron B800	4,464	+0%
1642	Celeron 877	4,464	+0%
1643	Pentium E6600	4,464	+0%
1644	Athlon II X2 220	4,464	+0%
1645	A6-9200	4,464
1646	Atom Z3740	4,464	+0%
1647	Atom Z3740D	4,464	+0%
1648	Celeron 2961Y	4,464	+0%
1649	Athlon II X2 240e	4,464	+0%
1650	Athlon II X2 240	4,463	+-0%

View full ranking →

A6-9200 Details

Ranking #1644 of 2060 in overall performance, the AMD A6-9200 sits toward the lower end of the desktop CPU spectrum as of early 2026. Despite its modest position in modern benchmarks, the processor remains relevant for basic computing tasks due to its integrated graphics and low power consumption. Designed for entry-level systems, the A6-9200 reflects a generation of processors that prioritize efficiency over raw performance, a trend that has become less common with the rise of high-core-count CPUs and advanced architectures in recent years.

The A6-9200 is built on AMD's Zen+ microarchitecture and manufactured on a 14 nm process node, a design choice that emphasizes energy efficiency over performance scaling. It features two cores and two threads, with a base clock speed of 1.1 GHz and a turbo frequency of up to 2.3 GHz. This modest clock speed is supported by a 65 W TDP and a socket FC-BGA1296, which is typical for low-power mobile or embedded platforms. The processor supports up to 8 GB of DDR3L/LPDDR3 and LPDDR4 memory, with a maximum bandwidth of 21.3 GB/s, though its performance is constrained by the dual-channel memory controller.

In terms of integrated graphics, the A6-9200 includes an HD Graphics 500 GPU, which is actually designed by Intel—a rare case of a processor featuring an Intel GPU, likely indicating a design compromise or error in the data. The GPU operates at a base frequency of 200 MHz and can burst to 1.05 GHz, supporting up to three displays. While this is sufficient for basic multimedia and light graphical workloads, it falls short of modern integrated solutions in both performance and feature set.

The A6-9200 supports several key technologies, including SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AES encryption, and x86-64 architecture, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of software. It also supports features such as Hyper-Threading, EIST, and Intel VT-x, which enhance multitasking and virtualization capabilities. However, its lack of ECC memory support and limited cache hierarchy—1 MB of L2 cache and no L3 cache—further restricts its utility in professional or high-performance environments.

Benchmarking reveals that the A6-9200 scores 4218 in overall performance, placing it below many mid-range processors from the past decade. Its single-core score of 4130 and multicore score of 4349 indicate that it struggles with modern workloads that demand high computational throughput. In comparison to CPUs like the Core i3-540 and Phenom II X4 B45, both of which have higher scores, the A6-9200 is clearly outpaced in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks.

Despite its limitations, the A6-9200 remains a viable option for lightweight applications such as web browsing, office productivity, and media playback. Its low power consumption and integrated graphics make it suitable for thin-and-light laptops or embedded systems where performance is secondary to power efficiency. As of March 2026, it occupies a niche in the market, serving users who prioritize cost and energy efficiency over computational power.