A9-9430 Benchmarks & Performance Report

Sysbuilds Alpha Stage!

Please take all results with a big grain of salt. Sysbuilds is in alpha stage at the moment which can lead to wrong data, strange counting errors, silly results and more. This site is under active development.

Benchmark Results

Combined benchmark scores based on multiple data points, giving a quick overview of this processor's performance.

Overall Score

Overall score for A9-9430 based on all benchmark results gathered. Look at this like a meta score, you will find more specific workload ratings below.

4,423 Rank: 1368

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1364	A10 PRO-7800B	4,426	+0.1%
1365	FX-8800P	4,424	+0%
1366	Core i5-2515E	4,423	+0%
1367	A10-7700K	4,423	+0%
1368	A9-9430	4,423
1369	Xeon E5540	4,422	+-0%
1370	Core i5 650	4,421	+-0%
1371	Pentium G3220T	4,421	+-0%
1372	Xeon L5640	4,420	-0.1%
1373	PRO A8-8650B	4,420	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Multicore Score

Multicore performance score for A9-9430 based on multi-threaded benchmark results.

4,318 Rank: 1697

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1693	Celeron N2920	4,319	+0%
1694	A6-5357M	4,319	+0%
1695	Core i5-2450M	4,318	+0%
1696	Core i3 550	4,318	+0%
1697	A9-9430	4,318
1698	Pentium 2127U	4,318	+0%
1699	Pentium N3540	4,318	+0%
1700	Celeron 2980U	4,318	+0%
1701	Core i3-370M	4,318	+0%
1702	Xeon 5160	4,318	+0%

View full ranking →

Singlecore Score

Single-core performance score for A9-9430 based on single-threaded benchmark results.

4,493 Rank: 1299

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1295	Pentium Gold 4415U	4,495	+0%
1296	Phenom II X4 980	4,494	+0%
1297	Xeon E5-2420 v2	4,494	+0%
1298	Core i5-2430M	4,493	+0%
1299	A9-9430	4,493
1300	Core i5-670	4,486	-0.2%
1301	Phenom II X4 970	4,484	-0.2%
1302	Core i7-2640M	4,483	-0.2%
1303	Xeon W3520	4,481	-0.3%
1304	Xeon E5-2608L v4	4,480	-0.3%

View full ranking →

Workload Scores

Performance scores grouped by workload type, normalized and aggregated from multiple raw benchmark results.

Number Crunching

Aggregated score for A9-9430 based on integer math, floating point math, and prime number computation benchmarks.

4,510 Rank: 1461

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1457	Pentium 2030M	4,511	+0%
1458	Pentium G2020T	4,511	+0%
1459	A4-7300	4,511	+0%
1460	Pentium 3550M	4,510	+0%
1461	A9-9430	4,510
1462	Core M-5Y31	4,510	+0%
1463	Athlon II X4 600e	4,510	+0%
1464	Celeron N3450	4,509	+-0%
1465	Pentium G630	4,509	+-0%
1466	A6-9500E	4,509	+-0%

View full ranking →

Data Processing

Aggregated score for A9-9430 based on data encryption, data compression, and string sorting benchmarks.

4,473 Rank: 1501

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1497	Celeron N2930	4,474	+0%
1498	Core i5-450M	4,474	+0%
1499	Pentium G840	4,473	+0%
1500	Celeron G1610	4,473	+0%
1501	A9-9430	4,473
1502	A6-9500E	4,473	+0%
1503	Athlon II X2 260	4,473	+0%
1504	A8-5545M	4,473	+0%
1505	Core i5-3339Y	4,473	+0%
1506	A4-6210	4,473	+0%

View full ranking →

Physics & Compute

Aggregated score for A9-9430 based on physics simulation and extended instruction set (SSE/AVX) benchmarks.

4,481 Rank: 1530

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1526	Celeron 1005M	4,482	+0%
1527	Celeron 4205U	4,482	+0%
1528	Pentium B960	4,481	+0%
1529	Pentium B950	4,481	+0%
1530	A9-9430	4,481
1531	Phenom II X2 555	4,481	+0%
1532	Xeon E3110	4,481	+0%
1533	A6-3410MX	4,481	+0%
1534	A6-3400M	4,481	+0%
1535	Core i3-350M	4,481	+0%

View full ranking →

A9-9430 Details

The A9-9430 stands out as a processor designed for mainstream desktop use, offering a modest step up from its predecessors with integrated graphics and a balance of performance and power efficiency. Released several years ago, it remains relevant in low-power systems and basic computing tasks, though it is now considered outdated by modern standards. Built on a 32 nm process, the A9-9430 features a dual-core design with a base clock of 2.5 GHz and a turbo frequency of 2.66 GHz, making it suitable for light multitasking and entry-level applications. Despite its age, it still holds a place in the lower end of the performance spectrum, particularly in systems where integrated graphics are sufficient and power consumption is a concern.

The processor operates on the FCLGA1155 socket, a common interface for Intel's second-generation Core processors, and supports DDR3 1066 memory with up to 32 GB of system memory. It provides a maximum memory bandwidth of 17 GB/s across two memory channels, which is adequate for basic productivity and media playback. With a TDP of 65 W, the A9-9430 strikes a balance between performance and thermal efficiency, making it suitable for compact desktops and small form-factor builds. It supports a range of Intel technologies, including Intel Virtualization Technology (VT-x), VT-d, and Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST), enhancing its versatility in virtualized environments and power-saving scenarios.

Integrated into the A9-9430 is an Intel HD Graphics unit, which runs at a base frequency of 850 MHz and can boost up to 1.0 GHz. This GPU supports up to two display outputs and is capable of handling standard-definition video playback and light multimedia tasks, though it is not suited for modern gaming or high-resolution content creation. The processor's support for AVX2, AES-NI, and SSE4.1/4.2 instruction sets ensures compatibility with a wide range of software, including encryption and multimedia applications. However, it lacks support for ECC memory and does not include AMD's proprietary technologies, reflecting its position as a mainstream, non-server-oriented CPU.

In benchmark testing, the A9-9430 achieves an overall score of 4423, ranking it #1366 out of 2060 processors in the Passmark database. Its single-core performance scores 4493, placing it #1298, while its multicore score reaches 4318, ranking #1695. These results place it behind several modern low-power processors and older quad-core designs, indicating that its performance is now largely outpaced by current-generation CPUs. Despite this, it remains competitive with other dual-core processors from the same era, such as the Phenom II X4 920 and the A6-3400M, which are similarly positioned in the lower half of the performance hierarchy.

As of March 2026, the A9-9430 is best suited for users requiring basic computing capabilities, such as web browsing, office applications, and media consumption. It is not ideal for demanding workloads like video editing, gaming, or virtualization, where more powerful CPUs and discrete graphics are necessary. Its low power consumption and integrated graphics make it a viable option in budget systems, but its age and limited performance mean it is unlikely to meet the needs of users seeking future-proof hardware.