Core i5-2300 Benchmarks & Performance Report

Sysbuilds Alpha Stage!

Please take all results with a big grain of salt. Sysbuilds is in alpha stage at the moment which can lead to wrong data, strange counting errors, silly results and more. This site is under active development.

Benchmark Results

Combined benchmark scores based on multiple data points, giving a quick overview of this processor's performance.

Overall Score

Overall score for Core i5-2300 based on all benchmark results gathered. Look at this like a meta score, you will find more specific workload ratings below.

4,523 Rank: 1266

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1262	Core M-5Y51	4,529	+0.1%
1263	A10-6800K	4,527	+0.1%
1264	Xeon E5-2620 v2	4,527	+0.1%
1265	Celeron G1830	4,526	+0.1%
1266	Core i5-2300	4,523
1267	A6-9500	4,523	+0%
1268	A8-9600	4,522	+-0%
1269	Phenom 9950	4,521	+-0%
1270	Phenom II X6 1075T	4,520	-0.1%
1271	Core i5-4210U	4,519	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Multicore Score

Multicore performance score for Core i5-2300 based on multi-threaded benchmark results.

4,468 Rank: 1286

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1282	Athlon Silver 7120U	4,471	+0.1%
1283	Xeon E5420	4,470	+0%
1284	Core i5-660	4,470	+0%
1285	Core i3-3240	4,469	+0%
1286	Core i5-2300	4,468
1287	Core M 5Y31	4,467	+-0%
1288	Core i3-2350M	4,467	+-0%
1289	Core i5-3340M	4,467	+-0%
1290	A6-7470K	4,466	+-0%
1291	Core i7-940	4,466	+-0%

View full ranking →

Singlecore Score

Single-core performance score for Core i5-2300 based on single-threaded benchmark results.

4,559 Rank: 1241

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1237	Core i3-2100	4,564	+0.1%
1238	Core i7-950	4,561	+0%
1239	A10-6800K	4,561	+0%
1240	Xeon E5-2648L v4	4,560	+0%
1241	Core i5-2300	4,559
1242	Core i3-4000M	4,558	+-0%
1243	Celeron G1630	4,558	+-0%
1244	Xeon X5650	4,556	-0.1%
1245	Pentium G860	4,556	-0.1%
1246	Xeon E3-1225	4,556	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Workload Scores

Performance scores grouped by workload type, normalized and aggregated from multiple raw benchmark results.

Number Crunching

Aggregated score for Core i5-2300 based on integer math, floating point math, and prime number computation benchmarks.

4,583 Rank: 1015

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1011	Phenom II X6 1090T	4,584	+0%
1012	Athlon X4 840	4,584	+0%
1013	Core i7-2670QM	4,583	+0%
1014	Core i3-7300	4,583	+0%
1015	Core i5-2300	4,583
1016	A10-6790K	4,583	+0%
1017	Core i5-760	4,583	+0%
1018	Pentium Gold G5600	4,582	+-0%
1019	Core i3-6320	4,582	+-0%
1020	A10-5800B	4,582	+-0%

View full ranking →

Data Processing

Aggregated score for Core i5-2300 based on data encryption, data compression, and string sorting benchmarks.

4,555 Rank: 1039

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1035	Xeon X3440	4,556	+0%
1036	Phenom II X4 970	4,556	+0%
1037	Core i5-6350HQ	4,555	+0%
1038	Core i3-7300T	4,555	+0%
1039	Core i5-2300	4,555
1040	Core i3-6098P	4,554	+-0%
1041	Xeon L5638	4,554	+-0%
1042	Pentium G4560	4,553	+-0%
1043	A10-7890K	4,553	+-0%
1044	Xeon E5530	4,553	+-0%

View full ranking →

Physics & Compute

Aggregated score for Core i5-2300 based on physics simulation and extended instruction set (SSE/AVX) benchmarks.

4,582 Rank: 1013

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1009	Core i7-2670QM	4,583	+0%
1010	Core i3-8145U	4,582	+0%
1011	Xeon W3570	4,582	+0%
1012	Xeon W3565	4,582	+0%
1013	Core i5-2300	4,582
1014	Xeon E5640	4,582	+0%
1015	Core i7-930	4,582	+0%
1016	Core i7-880	4,582	+0%
1017	Core i3-6100T	4,581	+-0%
1018	Core i3-4340	4,581	+-0%

View full ranking →

Core i5-2300 Details

The Intel Core i5-2300, released in 2011, stands as a relic of the early Sandy Bridge era, representing a transitional period in Intel's desktop processor lineup. While it may seem outdated by today’s standards, its performance in single-threaded and lightly threaded workloads still holds relevance in certain legacy systems. As of March 2026, this processor is no longer competitive in modern computing environments, particularly when compared to the top-tier CPUs in today’s market. Its single-core score of 4559 places it at rank #1241 among 2060 processors, indicating it remains above average in tasks that rely heavily on raw clock speed and efficient instruction execution. However, its multicore score of 4468, ranking #1286, reflects its limitations in handling multi-threaded applications due to its four-core, four-thread design and lack of modern architectural enhancements.

The Core i5-2300 is built on a 32 nm process and features a base clock of 2.8 GHz with a turbo frequency of 3.1 GHz, which was respectable at the time of release. It operates on the LGA1155 socket and supports up to 32 GB of DDR3-1333 memory, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 21 GB/s. The processor's TDP of 95 W suggests it was designed for mid-range desktops, offering a balance between performance and power consumption. Despite its age, it supports a wide range of technologies, including AES-NI, AVX2, and Intel’s virtualization features like VT-x and VT-d, making it suitable for light virtualization and encryption tasks.

Integrated graphics are provided by the HD Graphics 2000, featuring a base frequency of 850 MHz and a burst frequency of 1.1 GHz. This GPU supports up to two displays and is capable of handling basic multimedia playback and casual gaming, though it falls far short of modern integrated solutions. The processor also supports features like Hyper-Threading, though it does not include SMT (Simultaneous Multithreading), and it includes Intel's EIST and TXT technologies for power management and security.

In benchmark comparisons, the Core i5-2300 is closely matched by several other CPUs from the same era, such as the Core i3-3240 and the Xeon E5420, which have nearly identical multicore scores. However, it trails behind more modern processors like the Core i5-660 and the Athlon Silver 7120U, which offer better performance per watt and improved efficiency. In contrast, it outperforms low-power mobile processors like the Core M 5Y31 and the A6-7470K in single-threaded tasks, demonstrating its strength in legacy workloads.

Overall, the Core i5-2300 is best suited for older systems or entry-level desktops where integrated graphics and basic computing tasks are sufficient. While it lacks the performance and efficiency of modern processors, its compatibility with a wide range of software and hardware makes it a viable option for retro builds or systems where cost and power efficiency are prioritized over raw performance.