A8-7200P Benchmarks & Performance Report

Sysbuilds Alpha Stage!

Please take all results with a big grain of salt. Sysbuilds is in alpha stage at the moment which can lead to wrong data, strange counting errors, silly results and more. This site is under active development.

Benchmark Results

Combined benchmark scores based on multiple data points, giving a quick overview of this processor's performance.

Overall Score

Overall score for A8-7200P based on all benchmark results gathered. Look at this like a meta score, you will find more specific workload ratings below.

4,196 Rank: 1681

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1677	Celeron B815	4,202	+0.1%
1678	Celeron E3500	4,200	+0.1%
1679	Athlon X4 730	4,200	+0.1%
1680	A4-4000	4,197	+0%
1681	A8-7200P	4,196
1682	Phenom II P960	4,196	+0%
1683	Core i3-380M	4,196	+0%
1684	Core i5-2410M	4,195	+-0%
1685	Celeron B800	4,195	+-0%
1686	Core 2 Duo E8200	4,194	+-0%

View full ranking →

Multicore Score

Multicore performance score for A8-7200P based on multi-threaded benchmark results.

4,364 Rank: 1544

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1540	Phenom II X3 700e	4,367	+0.1%
1541	A10-5800K	4,365	+0%
1542	Core i7-640M	4,365	+0%
1543	A8-5500	4,364	+0%
1544	A8-7200P	4,364
1545	Core i3-560	4,364	+0%
1546	Core i3-2100	4,362	+-0%
1547	Core i3-4000M	4,362	+-0%
1548	Core i7-620M	4,362	+-0%
1549	Pentium Silver N5000	4,361	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Singlecore Score

Single-core performance score for A8-7200P based on single-threaded benchmark results.

4,084 Rank: 1691

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1687	Core 2 Duo E8400	4,089	+0.1%
1688	Phenom II P960	4,086	+0%
1689	Phenom II P940	4,086	+0%
1690	Phenom II X3 B73	4,085	+0%
1691	A8-7200P	4,084
1692	Athlon X4 730	4,084	+0%
1693	Core i3-370M	4,083	+-0%
1694	Pentium B940	4,081	-0.1%
1695	Pentium E5200	4,081	-0.1%
1696	Xeon E5606	4,081	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Workload Scores

Performance scores grouped by workload type, normalized and aggregated from multiple raw benchmark results.

Number Crunching

Aggregated score for A8-7200P based on integer math, floating point math, and prime number computation benchmarks.

4,537 Rank: 1246

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1242	Core m3-8100Y	4,538	+0%
1243	Pentium Silver N5000	4,537	+0%
1244	Core i5-3320M	4,537	+0%
1245	A10-9600P	4,537	+0%
1246	A8-7200P	4,537
1247	Xeon E5405	4,537	+0%
1248	Core i5-4350U	4,537	+0%
1249	Core i3-3240T	4,537	+0%
1250	Phenom II X4 B95	4,537	+0%
1251	Core i5-7Y57	4,536	+-0%

View full ranking →

Data Processing

Aggregated score for A8-7200P based on data encryption, data compression, and string sorting benchmarks.

4,495 Rank: 1363

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1359	Celeron G4930T	4,495	+0%
1360	Celeron G3930TE	4,495	+0%
1361	Core i5-4210U	4,495	+0%
1362	Core i7-3517U	4,495	+0%
1363	A8-7200P	4,495
1364	A8-3510MX	4,495	+0%
1365	Core i5-2410M	4,494	+-0%
1366	Celeron G3930	4,494	+-0%
1367	Atom C3508	4,494	+-0%
1368	Pentium G3420	4,494	+-0%

View full ranking →

Physics & Compute

Aggregated score for A8-7200P based on physics simulation and extended instruction set (SSE/AVX) benchmarks.

4,502 Rank: 1395

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1391	Athlon II X4 640	4,502	+0%
1392	Pentium G2010	4,502	+0%
1393	Athlon II X4 635	4,502	+0%
1394	A10-5750M	4,502	+0%
1395	A8-7200P	4,502
1396	A10-5757M	4,502	+0%
1397	Phenom II X4 820	4,502	+0%
1398	Core i5-4210Y	4,501	+-0%
1399	Core i5-4202Y	4,501	+-0%
1400	Pentium G3220T	4,501	+-0%

View full ranking →

A8-7200P Details

The AMD A8-7200P stands out for its integrated graphics performance, delivering a strong multimedia experience in a low-power package. While not a modern processor by today's standards, it remains notable for its ability to handle light gaming and media tasks without requiring a discrete GPU. As of March 2026, the A8-7200P is a product of a bygone era, originally released during a time when 45 nm manufacturing was common and integrated graphics were still maturing. Its 2-core, 2-thread design, built on the AMD architecture, reflects the performance expectations of early 2010s mobile and desktop platforms.

The processor operates at a base clock speed of 3.33 GHz with a turbo frequency of 2.0 GHz, though the effective performance is constrained by its single-core nature and limited thread count. It supports DDR3 1066 memory at a maximum of 32 GB, with dual-channel memory architecture and a peak memory bandwidth of 17 GB/s. The 65 W TDP and LGA775 socket indicate it was designed for mainstream desktops and laptops of its time, offering a balance between power efficiency and performance.

One of the A8-7200P's most defining features is its integrated HD Graphics, which operates at a base frequency of 850 MHz and can boost to 1.0 GHz. This GPU supports up to two displays and includes 16 GB of shared memory, making it suitable for basic video playback, casual gaming, and multimedia tasks. Despite its age, this integrated solution was competitive for its era, though it now falls far behind modern integrated graphics in both raw performance and feature support.

The A8-7200P supports a range of modern instruction sets, including SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AES-NI, and x86-64, ensuring compatibility with a wide array of software. It also supports virtualization technologies such as VT-x, VT-d, and EPT, which are valuable for running virtual machines or using advanced system management tools. However, it lacks ECC memory support, limiting its use in enterprise or server environments.

In benchmark testing, the A8-7200P achieves an overall score of 4196, placing it at #1681 out of 2060 CPUs in the Passmark ranking. Its single-core performance scores 4084, ranking #1691, while its multicore performance reaches 4364, ranking #1543. These results place it slightly behind processors like the Core i3-2100 and A10-5800K but ahead of the Core i3-370M and Pentium B940. While its performance is no longer competitive with modern processors, it remains in the middle tier of its generation, particularly in tasks that benefit from integrated graphics.

Given its age and limited core count, the A8-7200P is best suited for basic computing tasks, light multimedia use, and older systems where integrated graphics are essential. It is not ideal for modern gaming, content creation, or demanding applications, but it still holds value in legacy systems or as a low-cost upgrade option for users who prioritize affordability over performance.