Core i7-4710MQ Benchmarks & Performance Report

Sysbuilds Alpha Stage!

Please take all results with a big grain of salt. Sysbuilds is in alpha stage at the moment which can lead to wrong data, strange counting errors, silly results and more. This site is under active development.

Benchmark Results

Combined benchmark scores based on multiple data points, giving a quick overview of this processor's performance.

Overall Score

Overall score for Core i7-4710MQ based on all benchmark results gathered. Look at this like a meta score, you will find more specific workload ratings below.

4,986 Rank: 885

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
881	Core i5-6400	4,988	+0%
882	Core i7-6700T	4,987	+0%
883	Core i5-1030NG7	4,987	+0%
884	Core i5-4460	4,986	+0%
885	Core i7-4710MQ	4,986
886	FX-8320E	4,986	+0%
887	Core i5-6287U	4,984	+-0%
888	Xeon E3-1270 v3	4,984	+-0%
889	Athlon 3000G	4,982	-0.1%
890	Core i7-6567U	4,981	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Multicore Score

Multicore performance score for Core i7-4710MQ based on multi-threaded benchmark results.

4,693 Rank: 969

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
965	Xeon E3-1245 v5	4,696	+0.1%
966	Xeon E5-1603 v4	4,695	+0%
967	Intel Core i3-380UM	4,693	+0%
968	Xeon E3-1225 V2	4,693	+0%
969	Core i7-4710MQ	4,693
970	Core i3-9100TE	4,693	+0%
971	Core i7-2820QM	4,692	+-0%
972	Core i7-3612QM	4,692	+-0%
973	Core i7 940	4,692	+-0%
974	Xeon W-2102	4,691	+-0%

View full ranking →

Singlecore Score

Single-core performance score for Core i7-4710MQ based on single-threaded benchmark results.

5,181 Rank: 822

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
818	Core i5-7400T	5,184	+0.1%
819	EPYC 7551P	5,184	+0.1%
820	Core i3-8145U	5,184	+0.1%
821	Xeon E5-2667 v4	5,181	+0%
822	Core i7-4710MQ	5,181
823	Xeon E5-2687W v2	5,180	+-0%
824	Core i5-7300HQ	5,179	+-0%
825	Xeon Silver 4215	5,178	-0.1%
826	Core i7-6700TE	5,177	-0.1%
827	Core i5-4460	5,177	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Workload Scores

Performance scores grouped by workload type, normalized and aggregated from multiple raw benchmark results.

Number Crunching

Aggregated score for Core i7-4710MQ based on integer math, floating point math, and prime number computation benchmarks.

4,650 Rank: 828

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
824	Ryzen Embedded V1605B	4,650	+0%
825	Core i7-8550U	4,650	+0%
826	Ryzen 7 2700U	4,650	+0%
827	Core i7-4800MQ	4,650	+0%
828	Core i7-4710MQ	4,650
829	Ryzen 5 3500U	4,649	+-0%
830	Xeon E3-1220 v6	4,649	+-0%
831	Core i5-7500	4,649	+-0%
832	Core i5-4670S	4,649	+-0%
833	Core i5-1030NG7	4,649	+-0%

View full ranking →

Data Processing

Aggregated score for Core i7-4710MQ based on data encryption, data compression, and string sorting benchmarks.

4,640 Rank: 812

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
808	Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE	4,642	+0%
809	Ryzen 3 2200GE	4,642	+0%
810	Ryzen 3 1200	4,640	+0%
811	Core i7-4800MQ	4,640	+0%
812	Core i7-4710MQ	4,640
813	Pentium Silver N6005	4,640	+0%
814	Xeon D-1520	4,639	+-0%
815	Core i7-4770T	4,639	+-0%
816	Core i7-4720HQ	4,639	+-0%
817	Core i7-10510U	4,637	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Physics & Compute

Aggregated score for Core i7-4710MQ based on physics simulation and extended instruction set (SSE/AVX) benchmarks.

4,661 Rank: 821

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
817	Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G	4,661	+0%
818	Xeon W3690	4,661	+0%
819	Core i7-4800MQ	4,661	+0%
820	Core i7-4720HQ	4,661	+0%
821	Core i7-4710MQ	4,661
822	Xeon E3-1245 V2	4,660	+-0%
823	Core i7-3770S	4,660	+-0%
824	Xeon E3-1230 V2	4,659	+-0%
825	Core i5-4430	4,659	+-0%
826	Core i7-4700HQ	4,658	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Core i7-4710MQ Details

For users seeking a capable mobile processor with integrated graphics and efficient power consumption, the Intel Core i7-4710MQ remains a relevant option in the broader landscape of 2026. Released in 2014, this quad-core processor built on Intel's 22 nm process and based on the Haswell microarchitecture is now over a decade old, placing it firmly in the legacy category. Despite its age, it was once a high-end mobile CPU, designed for demanding workloads in laptops and mobile workstations, and continues to serve in niche scenarios where power efficiency and compatibility outweigh the need for modern performance.

The Core i7-4710MQ features four cores and eight threads, thanks to Intel's Hyper-Threading technology, enabling it to handle multi-threaded applications with relative ease. It operates at a base clock of 2.5 GHz, with a maximum turbo frequency of 3.5 GHz, allowing it to burst into higher performance when needed. It is paired with Intel's HD Graphics 4600 GPU, which supports up to three displays and features a base frequency of 400 MHz and a burst frequency of 1150 MHz, making it suitable for light multimedia and office tasks. The processor supports DDR3L-1333/1600 memory, with a maximum capacity of 32 GB across two channels, and delivers a memory bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s. Its 65 W TDP and FCPGA946 socket make it ideal for laptops that balance performance and battery life.

In benchmark evaluations, the Core i7-4710MQ earns an overall score of 4986, ranking #884 among 2060 processors, with a single-core score of 5181 (#821) and a multicore score of 4693 (#967). These results place it behind modern CPUs such as the Core i5-10310U and Ryzen 5 3500U, but ahead of older processors like the Core i7-6567U and Xeon E3-1270 v3. Its single-core performance is particularly strong, outperforming many contemporary mobile chips, while its multicore performance shows a more modest advantage. This suggests the CPU is better suited for tasks that rely on single-threaded performance, such as general productivity and web browsing, rather than heavy multi-threaded workloads like video rendering or scientific simulations.

The processor supports a wide array of features, including AVX2, AES-NI, and Intel vPro, which enhance performance, security, and manageability. It also includes advanced virtualization technologies like VT-x and VT-d, making it suitable for enterprise environments. However, it lacks ECC memory support and newer instruction sets such as AVX-512, which are now standard in modern high-end CPUs.

As of March 2026, the Core i7-4710MQ is best suited for older laptops or systems where upgrade options are limited. It remains a viable choice for users needing reliable performance in office applications, light content creation, or as a secondary machine. While it cannot compete with today’s top-tier processors, its legacy in the mobile computing space ensures it still holds a place in the broader ecosystem of Intel's history.