Celeron N2815 Benchmarks & Performance Report

Sysbuilds Alpha Stage!

Please take all results with a big grain of salt. Sysbuilds is in alpha stage at the moment which can lead to wrong data, strange counting errors, silly results and more. This site is under active development.

Benchmark Results

Combined benchmark scores based on multiple data points, giving a quick overview of this processor's performance.

Overall Score

Overall score for Celeron N2815 based on all benchmark results gathered. Look at this like a meta score, you will find more specific workload ratings below.

3,822 Rank: 2009

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
2005	Celeron N3000	3,829	+0.2%
2006	C-70	3,829	+0.2%
2007	Athlon X2 QL-62	3,826	+0.1%
2008	Atom N550	3,825	+0.1%
2009	Celeron N2815	3,822
2010	Intel Celeron J3060	3,821	+-0%
2011	Athlon X2 QL-64	3,816	-0.2%
2012	Intel Celeron N3150	3,815	-0.2%
2013	C-60	3,814	-0.2%
2014	Celeron 857	3,809	-0.3%

View full ranking →

Multicore Score

Multicore performance score for Celeron N2815 based on multi-threaded benchmark results.

4,240 Rank: 1937

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1933	Athlon 64 2800+	4,241	+0%
1934	Athlon II X4 640	4,240	+0%
1935	A4-4355M	4,240	+0%
1936	Athlon 64 3500+	4,240	+0%
1937	Celeron N2815	4,240
1938	Sempron 3200+	4,240	+0%
1939	Core 2 Duo T7500	4,239	+-0%
1940	E1-2500	4,239	+-0%
1941	Atom E3815	4,239	+-0%
1942	Athlon LE-1640	4,238	+-0%

View full ranking →

Singlecore Score

Single-core performance score for Celeron N2815 based on single-threaded benchmark results.

3,544 Rank: 2006

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
2002	Intel Celeron J3060	3,553	+0.3%
2003	Atom N550	3,548	+0.1%
2004	Intel Atom x5-Z8500	3,545	+0%
2005	C-60	3,545	+0%
2006	Celeron N2815	3,544
2007	Atom Z3775	3,543	+-0%
2008	Atom Z3740	3,542	-0.1%
2009	Intel Core i3-380UM	3,536	-0.2%
2010	Atom Z3740D	3,529	-0.4%
2011	Athlon X2 QL-60	3,518	-0.7%

View full ranking →

Workload Scores

Performance scores grouped by workload type, normalized and aggregated from multiple raw benchmark results.

Number Crunching

Aggregated score for Celeron N2815 based on integer math, floating point math, and prime number computation benchmarks.

4,465 Rank: 1713

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1709	Celeron N2807	4,466	+0%
1710	Celeron N2806	4,466	+0%
1711	A4-3320M	4,466	+0%
1712	Celeron N2820	4,465	+0%
1713	Celeron N2815	4,465
1714	E2-1800	4,465	+0%
1715	E1-6010	4,465	+0%
1716	Sempron 145	4,464	+-0%
1717	Sempron 140	4,464	+-0%
1718	Celeron E1500	4,464	+-0%

View full ranking →

Data Processing

Aggregated score for Celeron N2815 based on data encryption, data compression, and string sorting benchmarks.

4,438 Rank: 1705

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1701	Celeron N3050	4,439	+0%
1702	Celeron N2808	4,439	+0%
1703	Athlon II X2 250u	4,439	+0%
1704	Celeron 877	4,438	+0%
1705	Celeron N2815	4,438
1706	Atom D2700	4,438	+0%
1707	Celeron N2807	4,438	+0%
1708	A4-3320M	4,438	+0%
1709	Pentium 967	4,437	+-0%
1710	Celeron N2806	4,437	+-0%

View full ranking →

Physics & Compute

Aggregated score for Celeron N2815 based on physics simulation and extended instruction set (SSE/AVX) benchmarks.

4,446 Rank: 1716

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1712	Celeron N2806	4,447	+0%
1713	Pentium SU4100	4,447	+0%
1714	Celeron 807	4,446	+0%
1715	Celeron N2820	4,446	+0%
1716	Celeron N2815	4,446
1717	Celeron N2807	4,446	+0%
1718	Sempron 145	4,445	+-0%
1719	E1-7010	4,445	+-0%
1720	Atom D2700	4,445	+-0%
1721	Atom N2800	4,445	+-0%

View full ranking →

Celeron N2815 Details

For users seeking a low-power, budget-friendly processor for basic computing tasks, the Intel Celeron N2815 offers a modest solution designed for entry-level laptops and netbooks. Released several years ago, this processor is now considered outdated in the rapidly evolving landscape of modern computing, but it remains relevant for light workloads such as web browsing, document editing, and media playback. Built on Intel’s 22 nm process, the N2815 is part of the Atom family, designed with energy efficiency in mind rather than raw performance. It features a dual-core design with two threads, operating at a base frequency of 1.86 GHz, with no turbo boost capability. This limits its ability to handle more demanding applications or multitasking efficiently.

The processor is built on the Silvermont microarchitecture, which was introduced to improve performance-per-watt in mobile and embedded systems. Despite its age, the Celeron N2815 supports a range of modern instruction sets including SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AES-NI, and Intel’s 64-bit x86-64 architecture, enabling compatibility with a broad software ecosystem. It also includes virtualization features such as VT-x and VT-d, making it suitable for lightweight virtualization scenarios. However, it lacks ECC memory support, which limits its use in enterprise or server environments.

Integrated graphics play a key role in the N2815’s appeal, with the Intel HD Graphics engine capable of handling basic video playback and light gaming. The GPU operates at a base frequency of 313 MHz and can boost up to 756 MHz, supporting up to two displays. While not suitable for modern gaming or high-resolution content creation, it is adequate for everyday multimedia use. The processor supports DDR3L 1066 memory, with a maximum of 8 GB of RAM and a memory bandwidth of 21.3 GB/s across two channels.

In benchmark testing, the Celeron N2815 scores 3822 overall, placing it at #2009 out of 2060 processors in the Passmark database. Its single-core performance is slightly better, with a score of 3544 and a rank of #2006, while its multicore score of 4240 places it at #1934. These results indicate that the processor performs similarly to other low-power Atom and Celeron models but trails significantly behind modern CPUs. It is notably slower than more recent Intel and AMD processors, even in the same tier, such as the Celeron N3000 or Atom N550.

As of March 2026, the Celeron N2815 is best suited for legacy systems, secondary devices, or embedded applications where power efficiency and cost are more important than performance. It is not recommended for users who require high performance, multitasking, or modern software compatibility. For those upgrading older systems or building a low-cost computing solution, the N2815 may still be viable, but it should be considered a temporary or niche option in today’s computing market.