Pentium N4200 Benchmarks & Performance Report

Sysbuilds Alpha Stage!

Please take all results with a big grain of salt. Sysbuilds is in alpha stage at the moment which can lead to wrong data, strange counting errors, silly results and more. This site is under active development.

Benchmark Results

Combined benchmark scores based on multiple data points, giving a quick overview of this processor's performance.

Overall Score

Overall score for Pentium N4200 based on all benchmark results gathered. Look at this like a meta score, you will find more specific workload ratings below.

4,095 Rank: 1802

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1798	A4-9120	4,101	+0.1%
1799	Celeron 2957U	4,100	+0.1%
1800	A10-5745M	4,098	+0.1%
1801	A8-7100	4,098	+0.1%
1802	Pentium N4200	4,095
1803	A10-7300	4,095	+0%
1804	Celeron 1007U	4,095	+0%
1805	Athlon II X3 400e	4,095	+0%
1806	Core i3-2357M	4,094	+-0%
1807	Pentium 967	4,090	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Multicore Score

Multicore performance score for Pentium N4200 based on multi-threaded benchmark results.

4,288 Rank: 1792

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1788	Celeron E3300	4,289	+0%
1789	Celeron 1007U	4,289	+0%
1790	Celeron N3150	4,289	+0%
1791	Intel Celeron P4600	4,288	+0%
1792	Pentium N4200	4,288
1793	Pentium 2117U	4,288	+0%
1794	Celeron 2961Y	4,288	+0%
1795	Pentium P6000	4,288	+0%
1796	Athlon 64 X2 4800+	4,288	+0%
1797	Core i3-2367M	4,287	+-0%

View full ranking →

Singlecore Score

Single-core performance score for Pentium N4200 based on single-threaded benchmark results.

3,966 Rank: 1783

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1779	Core 2 Duo T6570	3,981	+0.4%
1780	Core 2 Duo T5800	3,981	+0.4%
1781	Core 2 Duo T5750	3,975	+0.2%
1782	Pentium T4300	3,972	+0.2%
1783	Pentium N4200	3,966
1784	Celeron 1007U	3,965	+-0%
1785	Phenom II X4 805	3,963	-0.1%
1786	Core 2 Duo T7600	3,962	-0.1%
1787	Intel Core i7-640UM	3,961	-0.1%
1788	Pentium 4405Y	3,960	-0.2%

View full ranking →

Workload Scores

Performance scores grouped by workload type, normalized and aggregated from multiple raw benchmark results.

Number Crunching

Aggregated score for Pentium N4200 based on integer math, floating point math, and prime number computation benchmarks.

4,515 Rank: 1423

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1419	Celeron G1830	4,515	+0%
1420	Pentium G870	4,515	+0%
1421	Pentium G850	4,515	+0%
1422	Celeron G1610	4,515	+0%
1423	Pentium N4200	4,515
1424	Core i3-2100T	4,515	+0%
1425	Phenom II X3 B77	4,515	+0%
1426	Athlon 5350	4,515	+0%
1427	Core i7-2677M	4,514	+-0%
1428	Core i5-2435M	4,514	+-0%

View full ranking →

Data Processing

Aggregated score for Pentium N4200 based on data encryption, data compression, and string sorting benchmarks.

4,505 Rank: 1299

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1295	A6-3620	4,506	+0%
1296	Pentium G4400	4,505	+0%
1297	Celeron G4930	4,505	+0%
1298	Athlon II X3 445	4,505	+0%
1299	Pentium N4200	4,505
1300	Core i5-4350U	4,505	+0%
1301	Core i5-650	4,505	+0%
1302	Atom C3538	4,504	+-0%
1303	Core i5-4310U	4,504	+-0%
1304	Core i3-7100U	4,504	+-0%

View full ranking →

Physics & Compute

Aggregated score for Pentium N4200 based on physics simulation and extended instruction set (SSE/AVX) benchmarks.

4,491 Rank: 1465

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1461	Xeon E5345	4,492	+0%
1462	Core i5-580M	4,492	+0%
1463	Phenom II X3 705e	4,492	+0%
1464	Pentium G640	4,491	+0%
1465	Pentium N4200	4,491
1466	A10-5745M	4,491	+0%
1467	Core i5-560M	4,491	+0%
1468	Core i7-2610UE	4,490	+-0%
1469	Athlon II X3 455	4,490	+-0%
1470	Phenom II X3 710	4,490	+-0%

View full ranking →

Pentium N4200 Details

The Intel Pentium N4200 stands out as a low-power, entry-level processor designed for compact and portable devices, particularly netbooks and small form-factor systems. While it is not a high-performance chip by modern standards, its 6 W TDP and 14 nm manufacturing process make it ideal for energy-efficient applications where thermal constraints are critical. Released several years ago, the N4200 reflects a generation of processors that prioritized power efficiency over raw computational power, and as of early 2026, it remains relevant only in niche markets such as budget computing or embedded systems.

Built on Intel's Apollo Lake architecture, the N4200 features four cores and four threads, operating at a base frequency of 1.1 GHz with a turbo frequency of up to 2.6 GHz. It supports DDR3L/LPDDR3 and LPDDR4 memory types, with a maximum memory capacity of 8 GB and a memory bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s across two channels. The processor uses a FCBGA1296 socket, which is common in mobile and fanless designs, and includes integrated HD Graphics 505, capable of handling basic multimedia and light gaming tasks. The GPU operates at a base frequency of 200 MHz and can burst up to 1.1 GHz, supporting up to three displays and offering decent performance for everyday productivity.

In benchmark testing, the N4200 achieves an Overall Score of 4095, ranking #1802 out of 2060 processors, with a Singlecore Score of 3966 (#1783) and a Multicore Score of 4288 (#1791). These results place it below most modern mainstream and enthusiast CPUs, but it holds its own against older mobile processors like the Core i3-2367M and Celeron E3300, which it matches or slightly outperforms. However, it trails significantly behind the top-tier processors in the industry, such as the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX or Core Ultra 9 285K, which dominate the top 50 lists with scores exceeding 8,000 in multicore and single-core benchmarks.

The N4200 supports a range of Intel technologies, including AES-NI, AVX2, SSE4.1/4.2, and Intel vPro for enterprise use. It also includes virtualization features like VT-x and VT-d, which are essential for lightweight virtualization environments. Despite lacking ECC memory support and high-end features like Intel's Turbo Boost Max Technology, its inclusion of Hyper-Threading and Enhanced SpeedStep ensures it can handle multitasking efficiently within its power envelope.

As of February 2026, the Pentium N4200 remains a viable option for basic computing needs such as web browsing, office applications, and media playback. Its low power consumption and integrated graphics make it suitable for devices where thermal and battery life constraints are more important than raw performance. While it cannot compete with modern high-end CPUs, it fills a specific role in the market for budget-friendly, energy-efficient computing.