Phenom II X4 B60 Benchmarks & Performance Report

Sysbuilds Alpha Stage!

Please take all results with a big grain of salt. Sysbuilds is in alpha stage at the moment which can lead to wrong data, strange counting errors, silly results and more. This site is under active development.

Benchmark Results

Combined benchmark scores based on multiple data points, giving a quick overview of this processor's performance.

Overall Score

Overall score for Phenom II X4 B60 based on all benchmark results gathered. Look at this like a meta score, you will find more specific workload ratings below.

4,404 Rank: 1394

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1390	Core i5-2540M	4,406	+0%
1391	Core M 5Y70	4,405	+0%
1392	Core i3-5015U	4,405	+0%
1393	Core i5-760	4,405	+0%
1394	Phenom II X4 B60	4,404
1395	Phenom II X4 840	4,404	+0%
1396	Celeron G1820T	4,404	+0%
1397	Intel Core i5-540M	4,403	+-0%
1398	Core i3-3120M	4,402	+-0%
1399	Core i3 540	4,400	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Multicore Score

Multicore performance score for Phenom II X4 B60 based on multi-threaded benchmark results.

4,430 Rank: 1384

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1380	Pentium 5405U	4,431	+0%
1381	Athlon II X4 641	4,431	+0%
1382	Core M-5Y10c	4,431	+0%
1383	FX-8800P	4,431	+0%
1384	Phenom II X4 B60	4,430
1385	A8-6500	4,430	+0%
1386	Intel Core i5-540M	4,429	+-0%
1387	Core i5 M 450	4,429	+-0%
1388	Pentium Silver J5040	4,429	+-0%
1389	Celeron B830	4,428	+-0%

View full ranking →

Singlecore Score

Single-core performance score for Phenom II X4 B60 based on single-threaded benchmark results.

4,386 Rank: 1405

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1401	A4-6300	4,392	+0.1%
1402	Core M-5Y10	4,389	+0.1%
1403	FX-6350	4,388	+0%
1404	A12-9700P	4,388	+0%
1405	Phenom II X4 B60	4,386
1406	Intel Core i5-540M	4,385	+-0%
1407	Core i3-6006U	4,385	+-0%
1408	Phenom II X2 560	4,384	+-0%
1409	Pentium 2020M	4,383	-0.1%
1410	Core 2 Duo E8600	4,382	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Workload Scores

Performance scores grouped by workload type, normalized and aggregated from multiple raw benchmark results.

Number Crunching

Aggregated score for Phenom II X4 B60 based on integer math, floating point math, and prime number computation benchmarks.

4,545 Rank: 1199

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1195	Core i7-5550U	4,545	+0%
1196	Core i5-3360M	4,545	+0%
1197	Core i5-4210M	4,545	+0%
1198	Phenom II X4 965	4,545	+0%
1199	Phenom II X4 B60	4,545
1200	Pentium G4400	4,544	+-0%
1201	Core i5-6360U	4,544	+-0%
1202	Phenom II X4 975	4,544	+-0%
1203	Phenom II X4 B55	4,544	+-0%
1204	Pentium G3450T	4,544	+-0%

View full ranking →

Data Processing

Aggregated score for Phenom II X4 B60 based on data encryption, data compression, and string sorting benchmarks.

4,548 Rank: 1063

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1059	Core i5-2500S	4,549	+0%
1060	A10 PRO-7850B	4,549	+0%
1061	Athlon X4 870K	4,549	+0%
1062	Core i5-2405S	4,548	+0%
1063	Phenom II X4 B60	4,548
1064	Core i7-6567U	4,547	+-0%
1065	Core i3-4170	4,547	+-0%
1066	Phenom II X4 B55	4,547	+-0%
1067	Athlon X4 860K	4,547	+-0%
1068	Core i5-7260U	4,546	+-0%

View full ranking →

Physics & Compute

Aggregated score for Phenom II X4 B60 based on physics simulation and extended instruction set (SSE/AVX) benchmarks.

4,514 Rank: 1307

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1303	Core i5-680	4,515	+0%
1304	Phenom II X4 B97	4,515	+0%
1305	Athlon X4 730	4,515	+0%
1306	Pentium Silver J5005	4,514	+0%
1307	Phenom II X4 B60	4,514
1308	Xeon E5472	4,514	+0%
1309	Core i5-670	4,514	+0%
1310	Celeron G3930	4,513	+-0%
1311	Pentium G2130	4,513	+-0%
1312	Pentium G2120	4,513	+-0%

View full ranking →

Phenom II X4 B60 Details

Built on Intel's 32 nm process, the Intel Core i3-2105 represents a mid-range desktop processor from the early 2010s, originally released in 2011. While it is now considered a legacy part, it remains relevant for basic computing tasks and entry-level systems. Designed for the FCLGA1155 socket, the chip supports DDR3 1066/1333 memory and offers a 65 W TDP, reflecting its focus on energy efficiency and thermal control for low-power desktop environments. The processor features two cores with four threads, enabled by Hyper-Threading technology, allowing it to handle multiple workloads simultaneously, albeit with limited performance at scale.

The Core i3-2105 operates at a base frequency of 3.1 GHz and can boost up to 3.46 GHz under load, providing a modest performance uplift when needed. It includes a 4 MB L3 cache, which helps reduce memory latency and improves data access speeds, particularly for frequently used applications. The integrated Intel HD Graphics 3000 GPU runs at 850 MHz base frequency and can reach up to 1100 MHz in burst mode, supporting up to two displays and offering basic multimedia and light gaming capabilities. However, it lacks the power for modern 3D games or high-resolution video editing.

In benchmark testing, the Core i3-2105 achieves an overall score of 4404, placing it at #1394 out of 2060 processors. Its single-core performance scores 4386, ranking #1405, while its multicore score of 4430 places it at #1384. These results indicate that the processor performs comparably to several mid-tier Intel CPUs from the same era, such as the Core i5-2540M and Core i5-760, but trails behind more modern offerings. In comparison to the top 50 processors, the Core i3-2105 falls far behind leaders like the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX and Core Ultra 9 285K, highlighting the significant advancements in CPU design over the past decade.

Despite its age, the Core i3-2105 supports a range of modern features, including SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AES-NI encryption, and Intel's virtualization technologies like VT-x and VT-d. It also includes EIST for power management and TXT for enhanced security. These capabilities make it suitable for light virtualization tasks, secure computing environments, and basic server-like functions in small-scale setups. However, its lack of ECC memory support limits its use in professional or enterprise environments.

As of March 2026, the Core i3-2105 is best suited for general office use, web browsing, media playback, and light productivity applications. It remains a viable option in budget systems or for users upgrading from older hardware, but it is not recommended for demanding tasks such as video rendering, 3D modeling, or high-end gaming. Its performance is comparable to early 2010s CPUs like the Core i5-540M and Pentium G4400, but it is outperformed by nearly all modern processors in both single-core and multicore performance.