Core 2 Duo P7350 Benchmarks & Performance Report

Sysbuilds Alpha Stage!

Please take all results with a big grain of salt. Sysbuilds is in alpha stage at the moment which can lead to wrong data, strange counting errors, silly results and more. This site is under active development.

Benchmark Results

Combined benchmark scores based on multiple data points, giving a quick overview of this processor's performance.

Overall Score

Overall score for Core 2 Duo P7350 based on all benchmark results gathered. Look at this like a meta score, you will find more specific workload ratings below.

4,139 Rank: 1762

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1758	Phenom 9500	4,140	+0%
1759	Turion II Neo N40L	4,140	+0%
1760	Celeron 3755U	4,140	+0%
1761	Intel Pentium P6100	4,139	+0%
1762	Core 2 Duo P7350	4,139
1763	Core i5-4210Y	4,138	+-0%
1764	Celeron 1017U	4,138	+-0%
1765	Core i3-2375M	4,137	+-0%
1766	Core i3-350M	4,135	-0.1%
1767	Core 2 Duo T6600	4,134	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Multicore Score

Multicore performance score for Core 2 Duo P7350 based on multi-threaded benchmark results.

4,247 Rank: 1914

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1910	E1-1500	4,249	+0%
1911	Core i5-2537M	4,248	+0%
1912	Atom D525	4,248	+0%
1913	Intel Core i3-370M	4,247	+0%
1914	Core 2 Duo P7350	4,247
1915	Celeron N3050	4,247	+0%
1916	Celeron 450	4,247	+0%
1917	Intel Atom x5-Z8300	4,246	+-0%
1918	Core i5-4200U	4,246	+-0%
1919	Core 2 Duo T6600	4,246	+-0%

View full ranking →

Singlecore Score

Single-core performance score for Core 2 Duo P7350 based on single-threaded benchmark results.

4,067 Rank: 1710

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1706	Core 2 Duo T6670	4,069	+0%
1707	Core i3 550	4,068	+0%
1708	E2-3200	4,068	+0%
1709	Pentium P6100	4,067	+0%
1710	Core 2 Duo P7350	4,067
1711	A8-5550M	4,066	+-0%
1712	A8-3550MX	4,066	+-0%
1713	A8-5557M	4,064	-0.1%
1714	Core 2 Duo E4700	4,063	-0.1%
1715	Core 2 Duo T7500	4,062	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Workload Scores

Performance scores grouped by workload type, normalized and aggregated from multiple raw benchmark results.

Number Crunching

Aggregated score for Core 2 Duo P7350 based on integer math, floating point math, and prime number computation benchmarks.

-- Rank: --

Number Crunching score not yet available.

View full ranking →

Data Processing

Aggregated score for Core 2 Duo P7350 based on data encryption, data compression, and string sorting benchmarks.

-- Rank: --

Data Processing score not yet available.

View full ranking →

Physics & Compute

Aggregated score for Core 2 Duo P7350 based on physics simulation and extended instruction set (SSE/AVX) benchmarks.

-- Rank: --

Physics & Compute score not yet available.

View full ranking →

Core 2 Duo P7350 Details

The Core 2 Duo P7350 sits at the lower end of the performance spectrum, ranking #1761 in overall score among 2060 processors, with an Overall Score of 4139. It trails just behind the Core 2 Duo P8800 (score: 4141) and is closely matched by the Turion II Neo N40L and Celeron 3755U, all within a narrow margin. Despite its modest performance, the processor remains relevant in legacy systems due to its low TDP of 25 W and 45 nm process node, which contribute to efficient power consumption. While the P7350 is now over a decade old, its 2-core, 4-thread configuration with Hyper-Threading and a base clock of 2.0 GHz, boosted to 1.86 GHz via Turbo, still provides basic functionality for light workloads.

Built on Intel's Penryn microarchitecture, it supports a range of modern features including SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES-NI, and Intel VT-x, ensuring compatibility with older operating systems and virtualization tools. The integrated Intel HD Graphics 3000 GPU operates at up to 950 MHz, enabling basic multimedia playback and light gaming, though it is no longer suitable for modern graphics-intensive applications. With a maximum memory capacity of 16 GB and DDR3 1066/1333 support, the P7350 is best suited for entry-level laptops or systems where power efficiency and cost-effectiveness are priorities. As of March 2026, this processor is largely obsolete in the mainstream market, with its closest competitors now being significantly faster, but it remains a viable option for legacy computing tasks or retro builds.