Phenom 9750 Benchmarks & Performance Report

Sysbuilds Alpha Stage!

Please take all results with a big grain of salt. Sysbuilds is in alpha stage at the moment which can lead to wrong data, strange counting errors, silly results and more. This site is under active development.

Benchmark Results

Combined benchmark scores based on multiple data points, giving a quick overview of this processor's performance.

Overall Score

Overall score for Phenom 9750 based on all benchmark results gathered. Look at this like a meta score, you will find more specific workload ratings below.

4,328 Rank: 1488

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1484	A4-7300	4,333	+0.1%
1485	Athlon II X2 280	4,330	+0%
1486	Core i3-4030U	4,329	+0%
1487	A12-9720P	4,328	+0%
1488	Phenom 9750	4,328
1489	Pentium B970	4,325	-0.1%
1490	Xeon X5472	4,325	-0.1%
1491	Celeron G550	4,323	-0.1%
1492	Xeon E5507	4,322	-0.1%
1493	Pentium G2020T	4,322	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Multicore Score

Multicore performance score for Phenom 9750 based on multi-threaded benchmark results.

4,141 Rank: 2037

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
2033	Core 2 Quad Q8400	4,150	+0.2%
2034	Athlon II X2 250	4,149	+0.2%
2035	A4-6320	4,143	+0%
2036	Core i3-3217U	4,143	+0%
2037	Phenom 9750	4,141
2038	Core i5-3317U	4,135	-0.1%
2039	Xeon W3503	4,132	-0.2%
2040	A4-5300	4,131	-0.2%
2041	Core i3 530	4,127	-0.3%
2042	Athlon II X2 245	4,121	-0.5%

View full ranking →

Singlecore Score

Single-core performance score for Phenom 9750 based on single-threaded benchmark results.

4,452 Rank: 1340

Rank	Name	Score	Visual
1336	Phenom II X6 1055T	4,455	+0.1%
1337	Core i7-2710QE	4,454	+0%
1338	Core i7-965	4,454	+0%
1339	Xeon E5-2620 v2	4,453	+0%
1340	Phenom 9750	4,452
1341	A10-7850K	4,450	+-0%
1342	Core i7-960	4,449	-0.1%
1343	Celeron G1620	4,448	-0.1%
1344	Xeon X5560	4,447	-0.1%
1345	Phenom II X4 B50	4,447	-0.1%

View full ranking →

Workload Scores

Performance scores grouped by workload type, normalized and aggregated from multiple raw benchmark results.

Number Crunching

Aggregated score for Phenom 9750 based on integer math, floating point math, and prime number computation benchmarks.

-- Rank: --

Number Crunching score not yet available.

View full ranking →

Data Processing

Aggregated score for Phenom 9750 based on data encryption, data compression, and string sorting benchmarks.

-- Rank: --

Data Processing score not yet available.

View full ranking →

Physics & Compute

Aggregated score for Phenom 9750 based on physics simulation and extended instruction set (SSE/AVX) benchmarks.

-- Rank: --

Physics & Compute score not yet available.

View full ranking →

Phenom 9750 Details

As of March 2026, the AMD Phenom 9750 occupies a niche in the historical landscape of consumer desktop processors, representing an older generation of multi-core designs from the early 2010s. While far removed from today’s cutting-edge CPUs, it remains notable for its integrated graphics and dual-core architecture, offering a glimpse into AMD’s transition during a pivotal era of x86 evolution. Positioned as a mainstream desktop CPU, the Phenom 9750 was designed for users seeking balanced performance without the need for a discrete GPU, particularly in budget or entry-level systems.

Built on a 32 nm process, the Phenom 9750 operates at a base clock of 2.4 GHz with a maximum turbo frequency of 2.0 GHz—though this appears to reflect a typo in the data, as turbo frequencies typically exceed base clocks. The processor features two cores and two threads, with a 65 W TDP that provides reasonable power efficiency for its time. It supports DDR3 1066 memory across two channels, delivering a maximum bandwidth of 17 GB/s and up to 32 GB of system memory. The CPU uses the FCLGA1155 socket, enabling compatibility with a range of motherboards from the era. Cache-wise, it includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache, and a shared 2 MB L3 cache, which was standard for dual-core Phenom processors.

Despite its age, the Phenom 9750 includes a suite of modern extensions for its time, such as SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES-NI, x86-64, and Hyper-Threading, though it's worth noting that Hyper-Threading is not applicable here due to the lack of SMT in AMD's design. It also supports Intel's vPro and TXT technologies, indicating broad compatibility with enterprise and business platforms. The integrated GPU is labeled as HD Graphics, with an integrated GPU base frequency of 850 MHz and a burst frequency of 1000 MHz, supporting up to two displays. This level of integrated graphics was sufficient for basic multimedia and light gaming but lacks the performance of modern discrete solutions.

In benchmark testing, the Phenom 9750 scores 4328 overall, placing it at #1487 of 2060 processors. Its single-core performance of 4452 ranks it #1340, while its multicore score of 4141 places it #2037. These results indicate that the CPU is outpaced by nearly all modern processors and even lags behind many mid-tier and older quad-core chips. In comparison, it is slightly slower than the Core i5-3317U and Xeon W3503, but faster than the Pentium G2020T and Celeron G550. The performance gap to the top 50 overall processors—such as the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX with a score of 9492—illustrates how far CPU technology has advanced in the last decade. The processor's weakest category is multicore performance, where it trails significantly, while its single-core score suggests it holds up better in tasks that rely on high clock speeds and low latency.

Overall, the Phenom 9750 is best suited for legacy systems, retro computing enthusiasts, or low-demand applications such as office productivity, media playback, and light web browsing. It is not competitive in modern workloads like content creation, gaming, or virtualization. For users seeking modern performance, this CPU serves as a historical reference rather than a practical choice. However, its inclusion in the broader ecosystem of AMD's desktop offerings highlights the company’s early efforts in integrating graphics and enhancing power efficiency, laying the groundwork for future advancements.