AMD E2-3800 vs AMD E1-6010

The AMD E2-3800 and E1-6010 represent two distinct entries in AMD's low-power lineup, released during a period when the company was focused on energy-efficient computing for budget desktops and embedded systems. The E2-3800, launched in 2014, was part of the Kabini family, while the E1-6010, released in 2013, belonged to the earlier Beema series. Though both processors share a 28 nm manufacturing process and the same Socket FT3, their architectural evolution and performance profiles reveal significant differences in design priorities and target markets.

Both processors are dual-core designs, but the E2-3800 offers a larger L2 cache of 1.907 MiB compared to the E1-6010’s 0.954 MiB, which contributes to better memory handling and reduced latency in workloads. The E1-6010 slightly edges out the E2-3800 in base clock speed, running at 1.35 GHz versus 1.3 GHz, but this advantage is offset by the E2-3800’s higher TDP of 15 W compared to the E1-6010’s 10 W. This suggests that the E2-3800 was designed for slightly more demanding tasks, albeit at a cost of increased power consumption.

In terms of performance, the E2-3800 holds a slight lead in overall system benchmarks. It achieves an Overall Score of 3933, ranking #1940 out of 2060, while the E1-6010 scores 4022, placing it at #1866. This indicates that despite its lower TDP and smaller cache, the E1-6010 performs better in certain workloads, likely due to architectural refinements in the Beema core. The E1-6010 also excels in single-core performance, with a Singlecore Score of 3865, ranking #1853, compared to the E2-3800’s 3695 at #1945. This suggests the E1-6010 may be more responsive in single-threaded applications.

Both processors support a wide range of instruction sets, including SSE, AVX, AES, and AMD-V, making them suitable for basic virtualization and multimedia tasks. However, the E2-3800’s larger cache and higher TDP make it better suited for multitasking and slightly more intensive applications, such as light video editing or web development. The E1-6010, with its lower power draw, is ideal for always-on devices or systems where energy efficiency is paramount.

As of April 2026, both processors are considered legacy parts, but they remain relevant in niche markets such as thin clients, digital signage, and low-cost home computers. While the E2-3800 offers better performance in multicore scenarios, the E1-6010’s efficiency makes it a compelling choice for users prioritizing power savings over raw speed.