Core 2 Duo T7300

Details and Benchmarks for Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

Sysbuilds Alpha Stage!

Please take all results with a big grain of salt. Sysbuilds is in alpha stage at the moment which can lead to wrong data, strange counting errors, silly results and more. This site is under active development.

Benchmark Results

Combined benchmark scores based on multiple data points, giving a quick overview of this processor's performance.

Overall Score

Overall score for Core 2 Duo T7300 based on all benchmark results gathered. Look at this like a meta score, you will find more specific workload ratings below.

3,913 Rank: 1956
Rank Name Score Visual
1952 Atom x5-Z8500 3,914
+0%
1953 V120 3,914
+0%
1954 Core i5-2537M 3,913
+0%
1955 Celeron J1900 3,913
+0%
1956 Core 2 Duo T7300 3,913
1957 Athlon 64 X2 3600+ 3,912
+-0%
1958 Intel Pentium J3710 3,908
-0.1%
1959 Athlon LE-1640 3,906
-0.2%
1960 Atom x7-Z8700 3,901
-0.3%
1961 Intel Core i7-820QM 3,900
-0.3%

View full ranking →

Multicore Score

Multicore performance score for Core 2 Duo T7300 based on multi-threaded benchmark results.

4,196 Rank: 2014
Rank Name Score Visual
2010 Atom Z670 4,200
+0.1%
2011 Pentium G620 4,200
+0.1%
2012 Pentium E5300 4,199
+0.1%
2013 Athlon X2 QL-62 4,198
+0%
2014 Core 2 Duo T7300 4,196
2015 Atom Z520 4,195
+-0%
2016 A4-6300 4,192
-0.1%
2017 Athlon X2 QL-64 4,191
-0.1%
2018 Intel Celeron N3010 4,188
-0.2%
2019 Core 2 Duo E8400 4,188
-0.2%

View full ranking →

Singlecore Score

Single-core performance score for Core 2 Duo T7300 based on single-threaded benchmark results.

3,725 Rank: 1935
Rank Name Score Visual
1931 Intel Celeron P4500 3,731
+0.2%
1932 Celeron N3050 3,731
+0.2%
1933 Core i3-2365M 3,730
+0.1%
1934 Celeron N2820 3,728
+0.1%
1935 Core 2 Duo T7300 3,725
1936 Atom Z3770 3,722
-0.1%
1937 E1-7010 3,715
-0.3%
1938 Sempron 2650 3,714
-0.3%
1939 Intel Core i5-470UM 3,709
-0.4%
1940 V120 3,709
-0.4%

View full ranking →

Workload Scores

Performance scores grouped by workload type, normalized and aggregated from multiple raw benchmark results.

Number Crunching

Aggregated score for Core 2 Duo T7300 based on integer math, floating point math, and prime number computation benchmarks.

-- Rank: --

Number Crunching score not yet available.

View full ranking →

Data Processing

Aggregated score for Core 2 Duo T7300 based on data encryption, data compression, and string sorting benchmarks.

-- Rank: --

Data Processing score not yet available.

View full ranking →

Physics & Compute

Aggregated score for Core 2 Duo T7300 based on physics simulation and extended instruction set (SSE/AVX) benchmarks.

-- Rank: --

Physics & Compute score not yet available.

View full ranking →

Core 2 Duo T7300 Details

As of March 2026, the Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 represents a relic of the mid-2000s mobile computing era, a processor that once powered a generation of laptops before the rise of modern multicore efficiency and integrated graphics. Released in July 2006, the T7300 is built on Intel's Merom microarchitecture, a significant leap forward from the earlier Pentium M at the time, and was designed for mobile platforms with a focus on performance per watt. At its core, the T7300 features two physical cores operating at a base frequency of 2.0 GHz, supported by a 65 nm manufacturing process that was cutting-edge in its day. It runs on the Socket 479 platform, requiring a PBGA479 or PPGA478 package, and includes a 4 MB L2 cache, a sizeable amount for its time, which helped mitigate memory latency in applications of that era.

The T7300's performance today places it far behind contemporary processors, reflected in its benchmark scores. It achieves a single-core score of 3,725, ranking #1935 out of 2060, and a multicore score of 4,196, placing it at #2014. These results are significantly below modern standards, with top-tier CPUs like the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX scoring over 9,000 in multicore performance. The overall score of 3,913 ranks the T7300 near the lower end of the performance spectrum, trailing behind processors such as the Atom x5-Z8500 and the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX, which are both more than 2,000 points ahead. This highlights the dramatic advancements in both CPU architecture and transistor scaling over the past two decades.

Despite its age, the T7300 includes several features that were innovative at the time, such as Intel's Enhanced SpeedStep Technology (EIST) for dynamic frequency scaling and support for virtualization via VT-x. It also supports a range of instruction sets including SSE3, SSSE3, and later SSE4.1 and SSE4.2, although it lacks support for more modern extensions like AVX-512. The processor is limited to a maximum memory bandwidth of 17.1 GB/s and supports up to 4 GB of LPDDR3 1066 memory across two channels. The TDP of 35 W was efficient for its time, but modern mobile chips achieve far higher performance at similar or lower power.

Integrated graphics are present, with Intel's HD Graphics capable of driving up to two displays at a base frequency of 311 MHz and a burst frequency of 500 MHz, though the lack of dedicated GPU resources limits its usefulness for anything beyond basic video playback. The absence of AVX-512 and the lack of support for modern gaming instruction sets like SSE4.2 further reduce its relevance in today’s software ecosystem. While the T7300 was a capable mobile CPU for its time, its current position underscores how rapidly computing technology has evolved.

Today, the Core 2 Duo T7300 serves primarily as a historical artifact or a component in retro systems, and is not suitable for modern computing tasks. Its legacy lies in its role in establishing the foundation for Intel’s future mobile processor designs, but it now stands as a testament to how far performance and efficiency have come in the past two decades.
Frequently Compared

AMD Ryzen 5 3500X 35 views

AMD Phenom II X2 555 32 views

AMD A6-5400K 32 views

AMD A9-9425 31 views

AMD A8-7200P 30 views

Intel Core i3-4030U 30 views

Intel Core M 5Y10c 29 views

AMD Phenom II X2 560 28 views

AMD Athlon II X2 265 27 views

AMD Phenom 9650 26 views

Intel Core 2 Duo T7300

Main Specifications

Designer: Intel
Name: Core 2 Duo T7300
Model Number: T7300
Cores: 2
Threads: 4
Base Frequency: 2000 MHz
Clock Multiplier: 12x (locked)
Core Name: Merom
Socket: PBGA479, PPGA478
Package: FC-PGA
Target Segment: Mobile
Max CPUs: 1
TDP: 35 W

Cache Specifications

Memory Specifications

Supported Memory Type: LPDDR3 1066
Memory Channels: 2
Maximum Memory: 0 GB
Maximum Bandwidth: 17.1 GB/s
ECC Support: No

PCI-Express Specifications

PCIe Revision: 2.0
PCIe Lanes: 1
PCIe Configuration: 1X1

Integrated Graphics

GPU: HD Graphics
GPU Designer: Intel
GPU Max Frequency: 500 MHz

Physical Specifications

Process: 65 nm
Die Area: 143 mm²
Transistor Count: 0.00 billion
Manufacturer: Intel
Word Size: 64-bit

CPU Features

MMX EMMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 ABM BMI1 BMI2 FMA3 AES RdRand ADX CLMUL F16C x86-16 x86-32 x86-64 Real Protected SMM FPU NX HT EIST TXT vPro VT-x VT-d EPT Secure Key SMEP SIPP IPT SSE4a SHA AMD-Vi AMD-V TSME SenseMI Boost 2 TSX SMT Flex Memory SME SEV FMA
Related News

Milestone for Intel Foundry: Fortinet Becomes First External Customer for Intel 4 Process

Cybersecurity firm Fortinet has selected Intel as its first external foundry customer to manufacture its upcoming Securi...

3 sources · 1 week ago

4 sources · 6 days ago

Intel's €5 Billion Mega-Investment Boosts Chip Manufacturing Capacity in Ireland

Intel has announced a massive €5 billion investment into its Leixlip, Ireland facility. These funds are designated to si...

3 sources · 2 weeks ago

AMD's Medusa Point Zen-6 APU Revealed: Benchmarks Surpass Rivals and Boost AI Performance

Leaked benchmark data for AMD's upcoming mobile APU, codenamed Medusa Point (Zen 6), reveals impressive performance metr...

4 sources · 3 weeks ago

Intel Raises Prices for Core Ultra Processors: Details on Arrow Lake Refresh and AI Demand

Intel has increased the prices for its Arrow Lake Refresh CPUs, including the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Core Ultra 5 se...

4 sources · 4 weeks ago

Login

Forgot your password?

Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies.