AMD Athlon X4 870K vs AMD Athlon X4 860K

Head-to-head processor comparison

Aggregated Scores

Combined benchmark scores for both processors


Overall Score

Out of 2,060 results in the database

4,460

Rank #1,324

vs
4,435

Rank #1,350

4,460
4,435

Athlon X4 870K wins by 0.6% (Rank #1324 vs #1350)

Singlecore Score

Out of 2,060 results in the database

4,470

Rank #1,318

vs
4,435

Rank #1,350

4,470
4,435

Athlon X4 870K wins by 0.8% (Rank #1318 vs #1350)

Multicore Score

Out of 2,060 results in the database

4,445

Rank #1,334

vs
4,436

Rank #1,360

4,445
4,436

Athlon X4 870K wins by 0.2% (Rank #1334 vs #1360)

Number Crunching

Out of 1,771 results in the database

4,587

Rank #998

vs
4,585

Rank #1,008

4,587
4,585

Athlon X4 870K wins by 0% (Rank #998 vs #1008)

Data Processing

Out of 1,771 results in the database

4,549

Rank #1,056

vs
4,547

Rank #1,064

4,549
4,547

Athlon X4 870K wins by 0% (Rank #1056 vs #1064)

Physics & Compute

Out of 1,771 results in the database

4,542

Rank #1,144

vs
4,543

Rank #1,135

4,542
4,543

Athlon X4 860K wins by 0% (Rank #1144 vs #1135)


Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of key specifications


Specification Athlon X4 870K Athlon X4 860K Diff
Cores
4
4
0%
Threads
4
4
0%
Base Frequency
3,900 MHz
3,700 MHz
+5.1%
Clock Multiplier
39x
37x
+5.1%
TDP (lower is better)
95 W
95 W
0%
Process (lower is better)
28 nm
28 nm
0%

General Information

Specification Athlon X4 870K Athlon X4 860K
Designer AMD AMD
Core Name Godaveri Kaveri
Socket Socket FM2+ Socket FM2+
Package µPGA µPGA
Memory Type DDR3 DDR3
Market Segment Desktop Desktop
Locked Multiplier No No

Designer

Athlon X4 870K
AMD
Athlon X4 860K
AMD

Core Name

Athlon X4 870K
Godaveri
Athlon X4 860K
Kaveri

Socket

Athlon X4 870K
Socket FM2+
Athlon X4 860K
Socket FM2+

Package

Athlon X4 870K
µPGA
Athlon X4 860K
µPGA

Memory Type

Athlon X4 870K
DDR3
Athlon X4 860K
DDR3

Market Segment

Athlon X4 870K
Desktop
Athlon X4 860K
Desktop

Locked Multiplier

Athlon X4 870K
No
Athlon X4 860K
No

Physical Specifications

Manufacturing process and die characteristics


Specification Athlon X4 870K Athlon X4 860K
Process 28 nm 28 nm
Die Area 245 mm² 245 mm²
Transistor Count 2,411 2,411
Manufacturer GlobalFoundries GlobalFoundries

Process

Athlon X4 870K
28 nm
Athlon X4 860K
28 nm

Die Area

Athlon X4 870K
245 mm²
Athlon X4 860K
245 mm²

Transistor Count

Athlon X4 870K
2,411
Athlon X4 860K
2,411

Manufacturer

Athlon X4 870K
GlobalFoundries
Athlon X4 860K
GlobalFoundries

CPU Extensions

Supported instruction set extensions comparison


Extension Athlon X4 870K Athlon X4 860K
3DNow!
ABM
AES
AMD-V
AVX
BMI1
CLMUL
F16C
FMA3
FMA4
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
SSE4a
SSSE3
TBM
XOP

Athlon X4 870K vs Athlon X4 860K — Comparison Summary

As of April 2026, the benchmark rankings reveal a tightly contested battle between AMD's Athlon X4 870K and Athlon X4 860K, two desktop processors released during a period when integrated graphics and cost-effective quad-core performance were central to mainstream computing. Both CPUs, part of AMD’s mainstream Athlon lineup, share a similar architectural foundation and manufacturing process, but subtle differences in clock speed and microarchitecture yield meaningful distinctions in real-world performance. The Athlon X4 870K, released in late 2014, features a base clock of 3.9 GHz and is built on the Godaveri core, while the 860K, launched in early 2015, operates at 3.7 GHz and is based on the Kaveri architecture—both utilizing a 28 nm process and the Socket FM2+ platform. Despite their close release dates, these processors target users seeking affordable quad-core performance without the need for discrete graphics, particularly in budget builds or entry-level systems.

The most telling contrast lies in their benchmark results. The Athlon X4 870K achieves an overall score of 4460, ranking #1324 out of 2060 in multicore performance, while the 860K scores 4435, placing it at #1350—just 26 points behind. In single-core performance, the 870K leads with a score of 4470 (ranked #1318), compared to the 860K’s 4435 (ranked #1350), highlighting the direct impact of the 200 MHz clock speed advantage. Across Passmark categories, the 870K slightly edges out the 860K in number crunching and data processing, though both perform nearly identically in physics compute, suggesting that the performance gap is most pronounced in applications that benefit from higher clock frequencies.

Core count remains identical—four cores with no SMT support—making these processors ideal for light multitasking and general productivity. However, the performance differential underscores the importance of clock speed in single-threaded workloads, such as gaming or legacy applications, where the 870K’s higher frequency provides a noticeable edge. Both processors support the same instruction set extensions, including AVX, FMA3, AES, and AMD-V, ensuring compatibility with a broad range of software, and both share a 95 W TDP, meaning they demand similar cooling solutions.

In conclusion, the Athlon X4 870K and 860K represent a classic case of marginal gains through clock scaling. While the 870K outperforms its predecessor by a small but consistent margin, the difference is most relevant for users prioritizing responsiveness in single-threaded tasks. For those with budget constraints or less demanding workloads, the 860K remains a viable option. As of 2026, both processors are now considered legacy, but they continue to serve as affordable options in entry-level systems or second-hand builds where cost-effectiveness outweighs peak performance.