AMD Athlon PRO 3045B vs AMD E2-6110

Head-to-head processor comparison

Aggregated Scores

Combined benchmark scores for both processors


Overall Score

Out of 2,060 results in the database

4,580

Rank #1,207

vs
3,960

Rank #1,921

4,580
3,960

Athlon PRO 3045B wins by 13.5% (Rank #1207 vs #1921)

Singlecore Score

Out of 2,060 results in the database

4,677

Rank #1,160

vs
3,734

Rank #1,929

4,677
3,734

Athlon PRO 3045B wins by 20.2% (Rank #1160 vs #1929)

Multicore Score

Out of 2,060 results in the database

4,434

Rank #1,373

vs
4,299

Rank #1,755

4,434
4,299

Athlon PRO 3045B wins by 3% (Rank #1373 vs #1755)

Number Crunching

Out of 1,771 results in the database

4,535

Rank #1,258

vs
4,495

Rank #1,570

4,535
4,495

Athlon PRO 3045B wins by 0.9% (Rank #1258 vs #1570)

Data Processing

Out of 1,771 results in the database

4,513

Rank #1,253

vs
4,461

Rank #1,593

4,513
4,461

Athlon PRO 3045B wins by 1.2% (Rank #1253 vs #1593)

Physics & Compute

Out of 1,771 results in the database

4,520

Rank #1,263

vs
4,465

Rank #1,636

4,520
4,465

Athlon PRO 3045B wins by 1.2% (Rank #1263 vs #1636)


Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of key specifications


Specification Athlon PRO 3045B E2-6110 Diff
Cores
2
4
-50%
Threads
4
4
0%
Base Frequency
2,300 MHz
1,500 MHz
+34.8%
Clock Multiplier
23x
15x
+34.8%
L1 Cache
94 KB
62 KB
+33.7%
L2 Cache
0 MiB
2 MiB
-74.4%
L3 Cache
4 MiB
--
TDP (lower is better)
15 W
15 W
0%
Process (lower is better)
14 nm
28 nm
50% less

General Information

Specification Athlon PRO 3045B E2-6110
Designer AMD AMD
Core Name Dali Beema
Socket Socket FP5 Socket FT3
Package FP5 FC-BGA
Memory Type DDR4 DDR3
Market Segment Mobile Mobile
Locked Multiplier Yes Yes

Designer

Athlon PRO 3045B
AMD
E2-6110
AMD

Core Name

Athlon PRO 3045B
Dali
E2-6110
Beema

Socket

Athlon PRO 3045B
Socket FP5
E2-6110
Socket FT3

Package

Athlon PRO 3045B
FP5
E2-6110
FC-BGA

Memory Type

Athlon PRO 3045B
DDR4
E2-6110
DDR3

Market Segment

Athlon PRO 3045B
Mobile
E2-6110
Mobile

Locked Multiplier

Athlon PRO 3045B
Yes
E2-6110
Yes

Physical Specifications

Manufacturing process and die characteristics


Specification Athlon PRO 3045B E2-6110
Process 14 nm 28 nm
Die Area 148 mm² 107 mm²
Transistor Count 3,500 0.00 billion
Manufacturer GlobalFoundries GlobalFoundries

Process

Athlon PRO 3045B
14 nm
E2-6110
28 nm

Die Area

Athlon PRO 3045B
148 mm²
E2-6110
107 mm²

Transistor Count

Athlon PRO 3045B
3,500
E2-6110
0.00 billion

Manufacturer

Athlon PRO 3045B
GlobalFoundries
E2-6110
GlobalFoundries

CPU Extensions

Supported instruction set extensions comparison


Extension Athlon PRO 3045B E2-6110
3DNow!
ADX
AES
AMD-V
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
CLMUL
F16C
FMA3
MMX
RdRand
SHA
SMEP
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
SSE4a
SSSE3

Athlon PRO 3045B vs E2-6110 — Comparison Summary

The AMD Athlon PRO 3045B and AMD E2-6110 represent two distinct generations of AMD's low-power processor lineup, showcasing significant differences in both manufacturing process and core architecture. The Athlon PRO 3045B, built on a 14 nm process, contrasts sharply with the E2-6110’s 28 nm node, a technology that dates back to the early 2010s. This difference in process size not only impacts power efficiency but also influences performance, thermal design, and overall capabilities. The Athlon PRO 3045B features a 2.3 GHz base clock, while the E2-6110 operates at 1.5 GHz, reflecting advancements in both frequency and power management over time. Core count is another key distinction: the Athlon PRO 3045B offers dual cores with two threads, whereas the E2-6110 also has dual cores but lacks support for simultaneous multithreading, limiting its ability to handle parallel workloads efficiently.

In terms of cache hierarchy, the Athlon PRO 3045B benefits from a more advanced design, with 0.488 MiB of L2 cache and a substantial 3.815 MiB L3 cache, compared to the E2-6110’s 1.907 MiB of L2 cache and no L3 cache at all. This increased cache capacity contributes to better performance in memory-intensive applications and reduces latency during data retrieval. The Athlon PRO 3045B uses the Socket FP5, which supports modern platform features, while the E2-6110 relies on the older Socket FT3, limiting its compatibility with newer motherboards and systems.

Performance benchmarks reveal a clear advantage for the Athlon PRO 3045B. It achieves an overall score of 4580, ranking #1207 out of 2060 processors, while the E2-6110 scores 3960, placing it at #1921. In single-core performance, the Athlon PRO 3045B scores 4677, ranking #1160, compared to the E2-6110’s 3734, which ranks #1929. The multicore score further highlights the gap, with the Athlon PRO 3045B reaching 4434 (#1373) versus the E2-6110’s 4299 (#1755). These results indicate that the Athlon PRO 3045B is not only faster but also more capable in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads.

Feature-wise, the Athlon PRO 3045B supports modern instruction sets such as AVX2, BMI2, FMA3, and AES-NI, enhancing performance in multimedia, encryption, and scientific computing. In contrast, the E2-6110 lacks some of these advanced features, including AVX and FMA3, and includes legacy extensions like 3DNow!, which are no longer relevant in modern software. Despite both processors sharing a 15 W TDP, the Athlon PRO 3045B’s improved efficiency allows it to deliver significantly higher performance within the same thermal envelope.

As of April 2026, the Athlon PRO 3045B stands out as a more capable and future-proof option for users needing reliable performance in thin-and-light devices or embedded systems. While the E2-6110 may still serve basic computing tasks, its outdated architecture and lower performance make it suitable only for very light use cases. The Athlon PRO 3045B, with its modern core design, advanced features, and superior benchmark results, is the clear choice for users seeking a balance of performance and efficiency in a low-power platform.